It is possible to be liable for serious harm even if the person had no intention of harming others. As a result of Strict Liability, a defendant in personal injury cases still has to pay for a victim’s damages despite not having done anything wrong. The strict liability laws allow victims to recover damages without proving that the other party was negligent or malicious.
Strict Liability is Exactly What it Sounds Like
When a jury decides whether the defendant’s actions should have or could have been avoided, it uses the strict liability definition. It does not take into account whether the defendant intended to cause the accident. If the defendant caused the victim’s injury, the only thing that matters is that the injury occurred because of the defendant’s conduct.
How Do You Win a Case-Based on Strict Liability?
- First, you must be injured to win a strict liability case.
- The defendant must also prove that the injury was caused by their product or actions.
You can bring a claim for your damages without proving negligence as long as their actions caused your injuries and the case fits under strict liability laws. Items liability claims or medical negligence induced by defective products are examples of strict liability.
If you are injured as a result of a defective product, the manufacturer is solely responsible for your losses. You don’t have to prove that they should have been more cautious or that they acted inappropriately. When a manufacturing fault occurs, strict culpability for a defective product is imposed.
The victim must utilize the product in a predictable manner for strict responsibility to apply. The victim’s injuries must have been caused by a product flaw. It is not necessary to be able to demonstrate how the defect happened. All you have to establish is that your injuries were caused by a defect.
How Are Strict Liability Cases Classified?
Strict liability cases can be divided into three types
- When a company designs and sells a defective product, they are solely responsible for any harm caused by the product’s use. In the case of a faulty product, the victim just needs to establish that the fault existed when the product left the manufacturer’s hands. The product must have been utilized in a normal way by the plaintiff. The maker is held legally accountable under personal injury legislation.
- A person who owns, transports, or otherwise keeps a wild and possibly dangerous animal as a pet may be held accountable for the activities of that animal. They’re completely responsible for any injuries that occur as a result of the animal escaping from the pet owner’s house, performing stunts for a show, or being transferred.
- Strict responsibility also arises when a party engages in intrinsically harmful actions and assumes risk as a result of such activity.
Not All cases are Strict Liability Cases
In most car accidents or other motor vehicle accident cases, the victim must demonstrate that the defendant is liable. In some circumstances, the victim may be required to prove that the defendant behaved recklessly or deliberately. These aren’t cases involving strict responsibility.
When the victim must prove that the defendant acted wrongly, the case is not a strict responsibility issue. Your personal injury attorney will be able to inform you whether or not your scenario falls under strict responsibility. To succeed and obtain the compensation you deserve in most personal injury claims, you will need to prove carelessness.
How Much Can You Receive in a Strict Liability Case?
Compensation damages are commonly referred to as “compensatory damages” since they are meant to recompense the injured person for the losses incurred as a result of the accident or injury. In circumstances where a defendant is judged strictly liable, attorneys assist in making their client “whole” again. If you are injured in a case that is subject to strict liability laws, you may be able to recover a wide range of damages.
- Expenses related to current and future medical care
- Loss of wages
- Costs associated with property damage and repairs
- Injuries and suffering
- Suffering from emotional distress
- Couples who lose their consortium (relationship with their spouse)
Defective product cases can also involve punitive damages. You may be entitled to damages based on the circumstances of your case as well as your losses. Make sure you are claiming the correct damages for your specific case by consulting with a personal injury attorney in California.
What Is the Purpose of Strict Liability Rules?
Strict liability standards exist because the courts believe it is only right that someone pays the price when they manufacture a defective product or participate in extremely hazardous actions. They consider the product has more to do with the maker than the sufferer.
If someone must pay for the victim’s losses, it is more just to make the producer pay rather than the sufferer suffering without compensation.
Furthermore, the claimant may be unable to show what the respondent did wrong to create the disaster. The evidence is normally in the hands of the defendant, who may or may not wish to reveal it.
The courts argue that strict responsibility rules promote justice because it is fair for the maker to compensate the victim’s losses and because of the difficulties that occur when the evidence is in the defendant’s hands.
What Does it Mean if I have a Strict Liability Case?
You don’t have to prove fault if your case is a strict liability case. It isn’t necessary to demonstrate to the jury what the defendant did wrong for a strict liability tort claim. You only need to show that you’ve been hurt because of the defendant’s actions.
It is possible for victims with strict liability to focus all their efforts on proving their damages in their personal injury claims. Applicants must all demonstrate that their injuries are linked to the defendant’s product or dangerous activity.
It is one less thing to worry about when strict liability applies in a case for which the defendant is strictly liable. To prove the case to the satisfaction of the jury, it is still imperative to thoroughly prepare all of the remaining elements with the help of a Personal Attorney at Deldar Legal Injury Attorneys in California.
Tagged with: Attorney to handle strict liability case in California, Best Personal Injury Lawyer Near Me, Deldar Legal Injury Attorneys in California, How to prove strict liability, lawyer to handle strict liability, lawyer to handle strict liability case in California, Strict Liability, strict liability case in califorina, strict liability in personal injury, strict liability in product liability, Strict liability lawyer